THE Referendum remoaners seem to be getting more desperate in recent weeks demanding mysterious ‘details’ of BREXIT.

Details about what precisely?

Now we have the latest missive from remoaner, Peter Hirst, claiming that people didn’t know what they were voting for in last year’s referendum.

He’s a bit late, they gave up on that delaying ploy a month ago. Of course he wants another referendum. They would lose that one as well. Would he then demand best of five?

I have news for Peter Hirst. It was 100 per cent clear what we were voting for in the referendum. We were voting for either leaving the EU totally or remaining in the EU.

As far as details are concerned no further public information is needed. There will be transitional arrangements required but these are primarily to smooth the path of both UK and European business procedures. Any trade deal is technically outside the leaving process and is a separate issue. It is simply convenient for both sides to conduct it in parallel.

As far as I know the remoaners are not demanding details of equivalent trade deals that are being conducted with other countries. If not, why not? It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that they are simply trying to delay the leaving process, or even worse, trying to frustrate the democratic will of the people.

Don Micklewright Weaverham