Football Association says Manchester ground still short of standard for Northern Premier League matches

Northwich Victoria left the Victoria Stadium in January after it was bought by Thor Specialities (UK) Ltd. Northwich Victoria left the Victoria Stadium in January after it was bought by Thor Specialities (UK) Ltd.

A GROUND Northwich Victoria wants to call home is still not up to scratch, according to the game’s governing body.

The Football Association has confirmed to the Guardian that Flixton’s Valley Road, where Vics owner Jim Rushe would prefer the team to host opponents this season, is not fit to host Northern Premier League matches.

“A ground must have the appropriate grading by March 31 each year,” said an FA spokesman.

“Flixton did not, so it does not qualify to be used for league matches at Step 4.

“Nor are we aware that any of our inspectors have been to see it since.”

Rushe says he has spent time, and money, improving the facilities there.

In June, an FA panel rejected his appeal to overturn the Northern Premier League’s decision to refuse permission for Vics to play in Greater Manchester instead of Stafford.

Despite that setback he agreed a three-years lease with Flixton Football Leisure, which runs Valley Road on behalf of landowners Trafford Borough Council.

Rushe says it would be better commercially and logistically for Northwich, evicted from the Victoria Stadium in January after land on which it is built was bought by a firm based next door, to be based there.

Vics’ owner acted quickly in March to find an alternative host after his first choice, Skelmersdale United’s West Lancashire College Stadium, was rated unfit by inspectors.

He says he picked Stafford because the team were on course to be promoted to the Football Conference, so needed a temporary home fit for a higher level.

However the players, second on the pitch to champions Chester, were barred from taking part in the play-offs as part of the club’s punishment for breaking finance rules.

Vics suffered a forced demotion to the Northern Premier League’s Division One South as well.

Earlier this month Rushe revealed that he intended to ask the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), based in Switzerland, to force the Northern Premier League to sanction a swap from Stafford.

“The court has registered an appeal filed by Northwich Victoria,” read a CAS statement on Saturday.

It has not yet agreed to pass judgement on Vics’ case, nor is it known how quickly a hearing could be arranged if it decides to.

The FA has declined to comment on the matter.

As a result, Andy Mutch’s first match in charge as manager will be played at Vics’ temporary home in Stafford this weekend.

Stamford are the scheduled visitors.

“It has been commonly known for a while that an agreement is in place,” said a spokesman for Stafford.

“Our home games will take full priority, with Northwich’s schedule fitting around ours.

“This business decision has been made in the best interest of our club, and also to help another that has lots of non-league history.”

Comments(16)

Nvfc fan says...
9:44pm Thu 16 Aug 12

Is anybody able to ask the fa why they have allowed darlington to play at bishop aukland when that agreement was not in place by 31st march.

Antony Rogers says...
7:37am Fri 17 Aug 12

“A ground must have the appropriate grading by March 31 each year,” said an FA spokesman.

“Flixton did not, so it does not qualify to be used for league matches at Step 4.

"Nor are we aware that any of our inspectors have been to see it since.”

Then again, like the fans, maybe the FA have had enough of Rushe and his continued lies, deception, debt and constant appeals....?

AsburyJuke says...
8:33am Fri 17 Aug 12

A deal for Darlington may well have been done after 31st March (just as Vics had their deadlines extended at the begining of last season)

BUT the FA say that Flixton's GROUND was not fit for Level 4 games on 31st March - Bishop Auklands ground was, so 2 different arguments. In fact Flixton is still no where near fit to hold level 5 matches never mind level 4

rico55 says...
11:07am Fri 17 Aug 12

Bishop Auckland have built themselves a super little stadium on the edge of their town next to the sainsburys superstore. Darlo to Bishop about 25 minutes on train.

Nvfc fan says...
5:42pm Fri 17 Aug 12

I did not mean in terms of ground grading. I meant in terms of a ground share agreement with has to be in place by 31st march and darlingtons was not irrespective of what standard the ground is.

Antony Rogers says...
7:16pm Fri 17 Aug 12

Nvfc fan wrote:
I did not mean in terms of ground grading. I meant in terms of a ground share agreement with has to be in place by 31st march and darlingtons was not irrespective of what standard the ground is.
Probably because Rushe already had a ground share agreement at Marston Road and Valley Road was not and still is not up to the ground grading.

WHS says...
9:32pm Sat 18 Aug 12

86? Time to call it a day. Start again without Rushe, share with Winsford or Lostock and play in the NW Counties
WHS.

Antony Rogers says...
1:08am Sun 19 Aug 12

WHS wrote:
86? Time to call it a day. Start again without Rushe, share with Winsford or Lostock and play in the NW Counties
WHS.
That's because Vics fans are voting with their feet and is it any wonder.

Rushe has taken the club to it's lowest level in it's long proud history and with the first match of the season, it's lowest gate in it's history.

But will Rushe give in and walk away?
No!
Should this be respected?
No!
Why?
Because the club is once again being operated above and beyond it's financial means, nothing has changed.

Questions are....
Should the fans that turned up to support the club yesterday feel proud?
Should the fans that stayed away yesterday feel guilty?

NO!

Vics123 says...
1:38pm Mon 20 Aug 12

I went to the game on Saturday - I was proud - because I was able to watch Northwich Victoria Football Club - I will follow them until such time as it is not in existence - if this happens - I can always say I followed Northwich Victoria Football Club - which if it does go - no-one will be able to say that again - as they will not be known as Nortwhich Victoria Football Club

WHS says...
7:58pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Antony, I think you may have to withdraw that comment it may well get you into SERIOUS trouble.
WHS.

GOFFY says...
5:12pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Nice comment Antony you have only said what most of the faithful Vics fans are thinking but not saying!!!

Goffy

WHS says...
5:15pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Whether true or not it could well be libellous it should be withdrawn.
WHS

GOFFY says...
5:51pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Quote from the dictionary for libellous
" false and malicious: constituting or containing a false and malicious published statement that damages somebody's reputation"
I do not think that Antony Rogers comment has damaged Jim Rushes reputation he has done that for himself.
WHS do you really think that JR reads these columns when he apparently doesn't read his tax demands.

Goffy

jcvics89 says...
2:54pm Thu 23 Aug 12

Vics123 thats what a real fan does they support THEIR TEAM regardless of the situation, all these so called 'fans' that have been watching vics "for years" are an embarressment to the club and should sod off and go and watch witton fail miserably this, next and seasons to come. To all GENUINE fans please go and sacrafice any personal beliefs and go and support YOUR team before it goes forever

WHS says...
4:53pm Thu 23 Aug 12

jcvics89. It is OVER, live with it. Witton will not fail because they are run by people who love the club and who are determined that it stays financially viable.
The years of Vics dominance were bought with other people's money and thankfully are now over for good.
WHS.
PS To Mr Antony Rogers. Mr Rushe will read these pages and he will sue, so withdraw that comment or risk the consequences.
WHS.

Antony Rogers says...
6:36am Sat 25 Aug 12

WHS wrote:
jcvics89. It is OVER, live with it. Witton will not fail because they are run by people who love the club and who are determined that it stays financially viable. The years of Vics dominance were bought with other people's money and thankfully are now over for good. WHS. PS To Mr Antony Rogers. Mr Rushe will read these pages and he will sue, so withdraw that comment or risk the consequences. WHS.
WHS: I have absolutely no idea what part of my post is libelous. (Please point it out)

By the way - Anyone interested in a Rushe Red Card, 1874 Protest T-Shirt £5 each?

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree