OXFORD student Rachel McLean was strangled by her jealous boyfriend
after she confessed she had been unfaithful to him, Birmingham Crown
Court heard yesterday.
After the killing John Tanner hid 19-year-old Rachel's body under the
floorboards at her lodgings, spent the night there, then left next day
for his own home in Nottingham.
On the train journey he began to weave the plot he hoped would
convince police of his innocence, and wrote the first of two letters to
the girl he knew was already dead, the court was told.
In the letter he referred to the male ''friend'' he claimed had
greeted Rachel at Oxford Station as they waited for his train. He later
told police the other man had then given her a lift home.
Mr Tanner, 22, a second-year classics student at Nottingham
University, told police he and Rachel had a passionate, intense
relationship, often making love seven times a night.
They had made love all over the house where she lived in Argyle
Street, Cowley, Oxford, including in the loft, he claimed.
New Zealander Tanner, of Lenton, Nottingham, admits the killing but
denies murdering Rachel on April 14 this year.
Mr Peter Weitzman, QC, prosecuting, told the court Tanner travelled to
Oxford on Friday, April 12 to see Rachel, a second-year student reading
English at St Hilda's college.
They had met the previous summer when he was working as a barman in
Blackpool, her home town. They became lovers and regularly spent
weekends together at each other's homes.
But during his final visit to Oxford, Tanner allegedly told police, he
''flew into a rage'' when Rachel declined his offer to get engaged, told
him she had been unfaithful, and said she wanted to split up.
''She tried to strike me and instantaneously I flew into a rage and
proceeded to place my hands around her neck.
''I feel I must have lost control. This kind of reaction I have never
felt before and I am bewildered that I should do this to someone I loved
so much.
''It was as if something snapped inside my mind.
''In my confused state I decided I must hide the body and after
sitting on the bed I proceeded to remove her body and place it under the
house.''
After returning home, Tanner regularly telephoned Rachel's home
leaving messages for her with her flatmates Victoria Clare and Margaret
Smith, said Mr Weitzman.
On April 16, two days after her death, he posted the letter he had
written on the train.
In it he referred to a meeting with a ''friend'' that he later
described to police -- who staged a reconstruction in an attempt to find
witnesses.
''Still, at least you won't be lonely,'' he wrote. ''Fancy seeing that
friend of yours at the station. At least you didn't have to get a bus
home. It was nice of him to give you a lift.''
On April 18, Tanner wrote Rachel a second letter, said Mr Weitzman.
In it he wrote: ''I have tried calling you all week but I guess you
are working. A call would be appreciated.
''Being without you is a terrible burden to bear. Please write or call
soon. I love you, Rachel, now and forever.''
Police investigating Rachel's disappearance found the letters when
they searched the house, contacted Tanner and interviewed him before her
body was finally discovered on May 2.
Forensic pathologist Dr Iain West told the court he had found a ''very
prominent ligature mark'' on Rachel's neck and concluded she had been
strangled with something like a tie or cord.
In his statement admitting the killing Tanner said: ''The sorrow I
feel is overwhelming and I deeply regret my uncharacteristic behaviour.
I cannot understand how I managed to destroy that which I hold
dearest.''
The trial continues today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article