CASTING about over my past 20 years of columns for a subject for this
one, as we columnists do, or some of us anyway, I came up with two
stoatirs, the first of which was angst.
Angst is a cracker for a column. You can admit anything through the
very confessional of angst. You can even admit (though it is ill
advised) to be bereft of sexual experience. You can tell the readers
that you once experienced gentian violet ointment. You can explain how
your childhood went wrong because you were chased by big boys in the
playground. Angst lets you do anything. You can even complain about
other journalists getting things wrong.
Jings, what a surprise that is, journalists getting things wrong. As
someone who is quite capable of blithely informing the public that Croy
is in Lanarkshire, I confess to getting things wrong from time to time
myself. As the public get most things wrong most of the time anyway, I
should not have thought my errors of particular importance. Just about
the worst thing which a journalist can get wrong, though, is getting
interviewed by other ones. I should know. I was once interviewed myself.
Well, lots of times really.
The fact that I am personally a rather cheery chap with ideas not
worth being listened to by primary schoolchildren (primary
schoolchildren are used to that: after all, they get talked to by
primary schoolteachers), and with an occasional line in maudlin
self-pity, means that every time I am interviewed by another fat hack
like myself I think up a goodly dose of angst to make me merr
intellectual like.
A journalist once claimed that I had done badly at school when in
fact, to my shame, I had done rather well. Doing well at school didn't
go with the angst.
The same chap -- a chum, I may add -- claimed that I had boasted that
women liked me. I hadn't boasted that. I'd merely claimed it as a fact.
By the time Mr Roy had finished with his article I was a wee,
overdressed, drunken womaniser with enough braggadocio to have seen off
Gargantua, Pantagruel, and Prince Seithnehen. What Roy didn't say was
that I am a shockin' boaster in the literary stakes. But did I mind?
Spot the Bum
No. It was rare fun and good for my business. Angst was good for
business back in my art school days too. Just when the object of your
desire was being dreadfully scornful about you because she perceived you
as a drunken oaf, and in fact probably the one who hid the camera in the
girls' lavatories at Edinburgh College of Art and ran a photo
competition for Spot the Bum (it was me and Ally MacLean, in fact; now
it can be, well, revealed), at that point, as a drunken oaf, you strike.
A soulful look worthy of Marcello Mastroianni and a suggestion that
you had the sort of fatal disease that only Strindberg could think up
and you were away.
Don't tell me I was out of order. The girls at Edinburgh College of
Art were nothing if not spirited and did a lot better at the angst than
ever I managed. In those days even Juliette Greco looked healthier and
happier than art students. Occasionally you were dragged back to your
paramour's parental homes where you discovered that, far from being the
wild and intense siren who had weaned herself on Iron In The Soul, the
lassie had been a sensible lassie with blonde plaits and puppy fat, had
been a prefect at Laurel Bank, and whose reading material had been
mainly confined to Five Go To Kirren Island. The parents with sense knew
it was just a phase.
Five years after art college the girls were sensible again and plump
too. Angst was no longer such a grand idea. And anyway they'd married
and got up the stick and were worried in case their daughters would
misbehave as they did 15 years on.
Angst is for young folk to behave in a silly way. Angst in the older
chaps and chapettes is just sad. Sad it is too that older chaps express
their melancholy in desires for the old ways. Especially when they get
the old ways wrong. And here we have the other subject for the column
which I dredged up, casting back over the 400 years of my columns as I
done this week and that but.
Sir Andrew Gilchrist, a distinguished and welcome correspondent of
mine and yourself, claimed that whisky never got cheaper. His gas was
put in a peep by another letterer who pointed out that the water of life
has never been cheaper, which is in fact true. When I was a boy a pint
of heavy or light was cheaper than a dram. This is no longer the case,
as I know every time I buy a beer drinker a pint of expensive, fizzy,
coloured water. The small goldie down the throat is without doubt cheap
enough for even the most miserable mendicant to purchase upon occasion
whereas the ubiquitous bottle of Bavarian Pils would cost enough to pay
the redundancy money for angst-ridden journalists fed up with being got
at.
Our most recent correspondent said that a salary of sixteen grand
could purchase 30 bottles of the amber fluid a week. It led me to
reflect. One reflection is that I must be earning more than 16,000
spondulicks. The other is that I haven't experienced angst since I
started slipping a wee goldie or two down my throat. I think other
journalists should take note.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article