THE former head of a boys' boarding school, Philip Cadman, 74, and one
of his teachers, William Printer, 36, yesterday had their 10-year jail
sentences for sexual assaults on pupils cut to six years by the Appeal
Court.
Lord Justice Watkins and two other Judges rejected their appeals
against the convictions imposed after both men's activities at Crookham
Court school, Newbury, Berks, were exposed by Esther Rantzen on her TV
show, That's Life.
But the Judges held that the sentences passed at Reading Crown Court
in July 1990 were ''excessive'' and should be set aside and substituted
with six years.
The school was owned by Cadman, who was also headmaster. He was jailed
for buggery and indecent assault, and Printer for attempted buggery and
indecent assault.
Lord Justice Watkins said: ''It was not suggested that any of the
(three) boys in respect of whom there were convictions were in any way
used with violence or otherwise ill-treated.''
Nor was it contended that what had happened had had a lasting effect
upon them.
The careers of Cadman and Printer, who had been of good character,
were ruined. The sentence on Cadman, now an old man, was ''crushing''
him.
A co-accused, Anthony Edmunds, who had pleaded guilty to a large
number of offences of buggery and indecent assaults on boys at a school
where he taught in the north Midlands as well as at Crookham Court, had
been sentenced to an overall term of six years for more offences of a
more serious kind.
At the trial, Mr Justice Drake described the two masters as sexual
perverts who had corrupted young boys and abused their position of
trust.
During the appeal hearing, Cadman's counsel, Mr David Cocks, QC, said
that the case had given the jury ''a great deal of anxiety''. One of the
chief reasons was the manner in which the investigation had been
conducted and the ''tactics'' adopted by the BBC and the That's Life
team headed by Esther Rantzen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article