LORD Goold, chairman of the Royal Scottish Orchestra, yesterday
announced his intention to resign his post at the earliest opportunity.
Informing directors at a board meeting which preceded the annual
meeting, Lord Goold said he had reached the decision because of pressure
of work in his own business, and also because of the increasing demands
of time made by the chairmanship.
The date of his departure will depend on whether the orchestra, which
has been in a long-running dispute with its senior management, decides
on any action towards self-government.
If the players have reached no decision by December 31, Lord Goold
will then ask the RSO board to appoint a successor.
He has been chairman since February last year. He has found himself
occupying increasingly the front line in the public dispute between the
players and the senior management of the orchestra.
Lord Goold's statement follows the announcement last month of the
resignation, in a year, of the orchestra's controversial chief
executive, Christopher Bishop, and the release, two weeks ago, of a
lengthy and critical Scottish Arts Council report that called for a
restructuring of the RSO board and reorganisation of management.
He mentioned this SAC report in his statement to the board.
''Regarding the recent review, considerable time will be involved which
I simply do not have available.''
He also said: ''I intimated to my fellow office bearers some time ago
my intention to stand down at this agm. However, about the same time,
the players intimated that they wished to consider the possibility of
going down the self-governing route. If that is the case, then obviously
they will form their own board and select their own chairman.
''Therefore, rather than appoint a successor who might hold office for
only two or three months, I'm prepared to continue in office until the
players have reached a decision on the direction in which they wish to
go, and to the point where any changeover could take place, provided
there is no undue delay.''
Speaking last night, Lord Goold said that he felt it was
''unfortunate'' that during his chairmanship he had found himself in
such a high-profile and time-demanding role.
''It is a non-executive chairmanship,'' he said. ''But it could be
full time if you let it.''
He admitted that the pressure of public and critical exposure during
his chairmanship had affected him. ''There have been times when I've
said: 'What the hell am I doing this for? I don't need this'. If you get
that flak in your own company, at least you're being paid for it. But to
take the personal attacks that you get when you're spending an awful lot
of time doing something because you felt it was worth doing does make
you regret it.''
It had got to the stage, said Lord Goold, where it affected his whole
life. ''When people come up to you and say: 'What are you doing to our
orchestra?' you begin to get almost scared to go to concerts.''
He added: ''Mind you, if I was leaving on that basis, I'd have left a
year ago.''
He thought it was going to be difficult to get non-executive people to
undertake such roles -- ''Businessmen prepared to give all that time and
take all the flak, and not get paid a bean for it.''
Representatives of the RSO players' committee were last night
performing at the Usher Hall in Edinburgh, and could not be contacted.
However, a source within the orchestra suggested that the players would
be ''delighted'' at the news of Lord Goold's resignation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article