ROBERT Brown attacks the SSP and the Green Party for protesting at Labour's kite-flying over changing the voting system to elect the Scottish Parliament (Letters, September 1). I think he is deliberately misrepresenting our concern. The Labour kite mentions an STV system based on a three- or four-member constituency. This is the same model being proposed for local government in Scotland by his Labour-LibDem coalition. This is specifically designed to minimise the impact of the smaller parties and retain the cosy coalition of the four main parties. The SSP is in favour of STV for local government; for two years I have represented the SSP on Fairshare, the lobby for STV in local government which the LibDems are also on.
But we are committed to getting wards large enough to reflect minority opinion on local government and we will be putting forward amendments to this effect at committee level. Can we expect Robert Brown's support?
We would have had STV for local government by now if only the LibDems had not let Labour off the hook in their first coalition deal. Let's hope they don't sell the pass again for ''party advantage''. Finally, could I remind Robert Brown that he was elected by the list system that he complains about and, by my calculations, he would be unlikely to be elected in Glasgow with a three- or four-member constituency, whereas Tommy Sheridan certainly would be.
Hugh Kerr,
SSP press officer, The Scottish Parliament.
ROBERT Brown, MSP, is wrong to claim that the media have exaggerated the support of the SSP. The number of SSP MSPs in the Scottish Parliament is fewer than the SSP would have got in an exactly proportional system, based on their percentage of the vote. He is also wrong to say that the SSP (or, indeed, the Greens) have reneged on their commitment to STV voting. What both Mr Harper and the SSP spokesperson actually said was that they feared that a new system of voting would be introduced in such a way as to make it more difficult for smaller parties by effectively reducing the constituency size from seven representatives, under the current regional lists, to three or four.
Mr Brown also seems confused over the purpose of the second vote, which he believes is a ''second-choice vote''. Although many of the electorate in Scotland used their two votes to vote for different parties, the majority did not. They understood, even if Mr Brown does not, that the vote in the regional list section does not have to be different from the constituency preference. What the second vote does give the voter is the opportunity in every region to vote for the party of their choice (at least among six) and stand a realistic chance of that party benefiting from the vote. If anything, the second vote is arguably a truer representation of party support than the constituency vote, as it is less influenced by local, personal, and ''wasted vote'' considerations.
Frank Hotchkiss,
27/2 Freelands Crescent, Old Kilpatrick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article