For long enough people have believed that the SFA, as a governing body, represent an unholy cabal of tinpot dictators whose rule over Scottish football seemed more than antiquated. Well, if they have a case, the agitators are about to have their liberator. As I write I can hear Craig Levein dusting down his Tolpuddle Martyrs' script and boning up on Martin Luther King.
Levein might not represent one of the greatest campaigns for justice in the world, but the way he has the SFA on the run is still an interesting sideshow. Tomorrow afternoon a body of men called a General Purposes Committee is due to choke on the fact that Levein is steadfastly refusing to pay a (pounds) 4000 SFA fine, for which, so is the aim, it will attempt to ban the Hearts manager from the touchline for four months.
There's only one snag with this plan, as David Taylor, chief executive of the SFA, knows only too well. It is this: the world has moved on from this type of authoritarian, swingeing justice and Scottish football had better wise up to it. Levein is refusing to pay, and Taylor, to this observer always a fair and decent man, still looks like someone whose neck is growing redder.
Everyone knows what Levein, the dreadful felon, got up to. In his characteristically intelligent, measured way, the Hearts manager alleged
that the referee, Dougie McDonald, had performed particularly poorly in a match at Rugby Park last season, during which Hearts had two players sent off. Levein may have been right or he may have been wrong in that estimation but the point is this . . . imagine any kangaroo court issuing a fine for expressing an opinion.
The SFA are in trouble on two counts. The first is in the very personality of Levein himself, probably the most modern in thought and deed of all the current SPL managers. In the old Jock Wallace days, when most football managers didn't know the difference between effluence and affluence, the SFA had a field day doling out fines for every intemperate malapropism in the book.
But things are different today. Men like Levein, Martin O'Neill and Alex McLeish have come along, football figures who, though they are all steeped in the game, have a more worldly, even a more cultured, perspective. The days, to be unkind about it, of the half-wit manager bawling like an agitated gorilla are on the wane, barring one or two outstanding specimens.
In Levein, the SFA have a specific case of a respectable, articulate coach saying simply: ''Excuse me. . . but don't treat me like an idiot.''
The second area in which the SFA are in a stew concerns a far more concrete playground: that of the law. As people within the SFA are already hinting, if this hanging-offence goes to an outside court, as some believe Levein is intending it to, I wouldn't like to be QC for the SFA which begs the judge: ''But M'lud, for these criticisms of refs we've always slapped a fine.'' The more you think about it, the more absurd it is.
I fear Levein, by late tomorrow, may not have stumped up a bawbee to the SFA, far less their cash-settlement for (pounds) 4000. After that, should the SFA seek to ban him, which would be extremely hurtful to Levein and Hearts, the so-called ''offender'' may be moved to hit the SFA with a counter-injunction himself. Either way, we are witnessing the last days of the Raj.
Levein snubs SFA, Page 30
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article