A SCOTTISH council yesterday became the first to agree to ban the use of mobile phone cameras in schools.
West Lothian Council is responding to fears that images transmitted from the playground or classroom could be exploited by paedophiles.
According to one teaching union, paedophiles might resort to bribing pupils to send pictures that could be manipulated to create pornography.
The council's children services and lifelong learning committee ruled that pupils will still be able to carry their phones switched off in their pockets or bags, but will not be allowed to take any pictures while on school property.
A council spokesman said: ''We think this is common sense. Like any other policy it will rely on the goodwill of parents and pupils themselves. Pupils themselves are saying they appreciate the fact that people will not be able to take pictures of them at school. It is a matter of respecting others.''
Carol Bartholomew, convener of the committee, said: ''The safety, security and well-being of the children in our schools is one of the reasons for not allowing mobile phone cameras to be used in schools.
''The other is about respecting the rights of children and their parents to know when pictures are being taken and how they are being used.''
Judith Gillespie, development manager of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, described the move as ''synthetic hysteria''.
She said: ''Mobile phones should be banned from schools per se. There is no reason to get worked up about any particular brand such as camera phones.''
However, the decision was welcomed by the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, whose general secretary, David Eaglesham, said: ''I think Judith takes a very short-sighted view of what is happening in education. It is going to be a growing problem.
''There is a difference between being able to talk or send a text message from school, and being able to send an image - perhaps round the world - instantly. The people who supply these phones have said there is a risk. Other people should be aware.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article