Clydebank .............. 2
Hibernian ............... 2
HIBERNIAN, by the very nature of their size, can claim to be among the top half-dozen clubs in the country, but while the elite of Scottish football were having a holiday at the weekend, the Easter Road men were finding out a few hard facts about life in the first division.
They lost a goal in injury time against Clydebank at Boghead and dropped two points. Those, added to the points already dropped against Stranraer and Falkirk, could prove crucial in their attempt to escape from a division in which, as they say, it takes a bit of fighting, biting, and scratching to succeed.
The truth is, Hibs were, indeed, fortunate to come away with anything at all. Clydebank were the better side, more composed, more determined, and certainly more aware of the qualities needed at this level.
If the players are unaware of what is needed, then manager Alex McLeish certainly knows how the land lies. ''I really don't want to take away too much from Clydebank,'' he said. ''But that was a poor performance by Hibs, from start to finish.
''We didn't have the confidence, composure, or sharpness that we asked for. That type of performance is not going to do.
''We didn't test their defence at all. Even I could have played against our front lot today and not been troubled. It was a poor show, and I only exempt our goalkeeper Olli Gottskuksson from criticism.''
Substitute Kevin Harper, who could be on his way to Derby County soon, perked things up a bit when he came on at the start of the second half for Paul Tosh, but even he admitted that the Edinburgh club were a bit fortunate to escape with anything at all.
Said Harper: ''We didn't play well at all and Clydebank probably deserved the three points, so we're happy to get away with one.
''Clydebank battled for 90 minutes and every team in this division is going to do that when they play against us. This season certainly isn't going to be a stroll in the park for us.''
Clydebank manager Ian McCall, who has the added pressure of worrying about the future of a club with very little support and financial problems, was also convinced that Hibs were fortunate. He said: ''I'm very disappointed that we took only one point from this game, but as we scored so late on, I suppose we have to be happy with that.
''Only one team played football in the first half and it wasn't Hibs. I think we have adapted well after getting promotion last season and some of our younger players have exceptional ability. They have just got to believe in themselves.''
Hibs were a huge disappointment, especially in the first half. Only two magnificent saves from Gottskulksson - one from Paul Lovering, the other from Scott Miller - kept Hibs in the match.
However, the introduction of Harper paid immediate dividends for McLeish's side. In 58 minutes, Hibs produced their first real chance of the match - and took it.
Clydebank goalkeeper Colin Scott blocked two efforts from Pat McGinlay, but the ball broke to Harper, who had the easiest of jobs to prod in the rebound.
The home side then gave Hibs a lesson in how to battle. They stepped things up and deservedly equalised in 73 minutes when Tom Smith ran on to a cross from Craig Taggart. The full back controlled it well, took the ball round the keeper, but then stumbled. Gary Teale, however, was in support and he supplied the finishing touch.
Then came an amazing finish. With just seconds of normal time left, Stevie Crawford volleyed in what looked like the winning goal, but Clydebank again displayed tremendous grit and determination, and with two minutes of injury time on the clock, defender Kenny Brannigan went upfield to power in a header from a Teale corner.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article