Davenham fights becoming a suburb of Northwich

Davenham fights becoming a suburb of Northwich

Davenham fights becoming a suburb of Northwich

First published in News

AN UNPRECEDENTED number of Davenham residents are rallying to prove that they live in a village and not a suburb of Northwich.

The village may be reclassified as a suburb of Northwich in Cheshire West and Chester Council’s (CWAC) local plan, which will go before a hearing this month.

Davenham Parish Council has submitted a document outlining its objections to the move, arguing that it is clearly identifiable as a rural community, that although the village is linked with Leftwich and Kingsmead as an electoral ward housing allocations should not be based on administrative boundaries and that the wrong classification could lead to Davenham facing too much development.

The council’s statement states: “Villages are an important element in the UK historic and social structure and the failure of the draft local plan to recognise this could lead to them being overwhelmed with housing development well beyond the pattern of their historic organic growth rate.”

During work to create a neighbourhood plan, Davenham Parish Council has also had about 300 responses from residents fighting to keep village status.

Clr Andy Duff, parish council chairman, said: “There are 1,200 households in Davenham and nearly a third have responded, which is incredible, it’s an unprecedented response.”

Clr Katie Mattinson, who gave a presentation to villagers about the neighbourhood plan, said: “The overriding response is that people want to live in a rural village.”

She said a number of residents had suggested starting a petition about the issue.

“These are residents who want to get up and do something about it and I feel we should help them to do that,” she said.

The local plan examination hearing starts on June 17 with Northwich on the agenda on June 25.

It will take place at Chester Town Hall, in Northgate Street.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:14am Thu 12 Jun 14

Local Fella says...

Sounds to me like a bit of "Snobbery"....are they to embarrassed to live in Northwich ?
Sounds to me like a bit of "Snobbery"....are they to embarrassed to live in Northwich ? Local Fella
  • Score: -1

7:51am Sat 14 Jun 14

keith moss says...

Having just read the " rural/urban " classification guides I'm afraid Davenham is now "town and fringe" based on population density and the distance between dwellings.This classification system is used to assess the collective output of areas and can be used to support disputed planning applications in situations where individual objections are ignored in favour of an areas "overall economic interest". Snobbery ? No this is to do with manipulation,control and the long term balancing of local government spending by maximising returns and revenues across local areas.Insofar as areas such as Davenham and Hartford are being targeted because of high house values,increased future tax potential.They are areas full of social classification one's and two's and a few of the posher three's ,are areas where councils hold areas of land (already earmarked for housing development under the nationally led and Osbornised "local land development plans").In short you all voted for the stitch up which sadly you are about to endure.A simple case of CWAC putting bullets in Richboroughs gun.This is the solution,not the problem x
Having just read the " rural/urban " classification guides I'm afraid Davenham is now "town and fringe" based on population density and the distance between dwellings.This classification system is used to assess the collective output of areas and can be used to support disputed planning applications in situations where individual objections are ignored in favour of an areas "overall economic interest". Snobbery ? No this is to do with manipulation,control and the long term balancing of local government spending by maximising returns and revenues across local areas.Insofar as areas such as Davenham and Hartford are being targeted because of high house values,increased future tax potential.They are areas full of social classification one's and two's and a few of the posher three's ,are areas where councils hold areas of land (already earmarked for housing development under the nationally led and Osbornised "local land development plans").In short you all voted for the stitch up which sadly you are about to endure.A simple case of CWAC putting bullets in Richboroughs gun.This is the solution,not the problem x keith moss
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree