Fury after CWAC reverses decision on Davenham homes

FURIOUS villagers branded councillors ‘appalling and disgraceful’ after they said no to housing plans then changed their minds.

Davenham residents breathed a sigh of relief when Cheshire West and Chester Council’s (CWAC) planning committee rejected proposals for 36 houses off Green Lane.

But their celebrations were shortlived as planning officers told the committee that the plans were ‘ticking all the boxes’ and asked councillors how they could defend a refusal at an appeal.

A second vote was called and this time the plans were given the green light.

Fiona Edwards, CWAC’s chief planning officer, told councillors: “It’s my job to defend the council against costs for appeal where we cannot substantiate grounds for refusal.

“This is sustainable and it’s ticking all the boxes for affordable housing, open space, public art and education.

“How can a refusal be substantiated by your officers at appeal?”

After the second vote was passed residents told the committee they were a disgrace and the process was a waste of time.

One resident said: “You made the right decision then went back on it because it’s too expensive.

“It’s appalling and disgraceful.”

The planning committee heard from resident Nigel Goward, parish council chairman Clr Tony Sellers and ward CWAC councillor Elton Watson, who all stressed objections to the plans.

These included the impact on traffic and congestion in the village, especially in the narrow one-way system of Green Lane, the impact on the drainage systems and on the already full village school, as well as the erosion of a traditional village by building in green buffers.

Clr Sellers said: “Villages are a beautiful part of England and once lost they are never to be recovered.

“We believe this unacceptably eats into the boundary that maintains character and retains urban sprawl.”

The committee also heard from John Suckley, planning agent for Bloor Homes, who said that residents’ concerns had been addressed in the application, plans were sustainable and Davenham was a suitable location.

He stressed that the statutory consultees had raised no objections.

Clr Eveleigh Moore Dutton, planning committee member, said: “It’s most disappointing that there doesn’t seem to be any benefit to the wider village.

“But I can see that it’s very difficult to oppose this, we need sound planning grounds, so it causes us some problems.”

Comments(6)

AntiNimby says...
12:26pm Fri 15 Mar 13

CWAC strikes again.

47thmoon says...
12:55pm Fri 15 Mar 13

how can anyone have confidence in a council which says one thing does another? Time to go

pdrinkwater says...
1:43pm Fri 15 Mar 13

i wonder how many tory councillers have taken a back hander or freebee for this lot its just like the one way system in northwich its like dunham road at school time its like the traffic lights at kingsmead just one big bottleneck and i here that these so called council officers are trying to sort the regeneration out in chester just like big brother david in london they cant sort a pixxs up in a brewery

mattwmouse says...
9:26pm Fri 15 Mar 13

I was at a council forum in February, what struck me was how eager the chair was to get through the questions from the Northwich Community so quickly... Would be nice to get a proper say, and a debate where we can feel confident about speaking, without taking up 'too much time'. Sick and tired of the 20,000 or so people in Northwich being taken for mugs.

taffy says...
9:33am Sat 16 Mar 13

Every area of Northwich is having to take its share of development with the brunt falling on Wincah, Lostock and Winnington why do these people feel they should be exempt is it because the majority are not actually Northwich people

Daniel18 says...
11:38am Sat 16 Mar 13

Taffy,

I agree with you, Davenham is not a case, all areas have got to take their fair share of new homes

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree